(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 10695-10700 | Article Number: ijese.2016.776
Published Online: November 11, 2016
Article Views: 283 | Article Download: 232
Abstract
In this article, the authors substantiate the existence of the personality qualities of future educational psychologists (PQFEP) that are, in fact, a sum of knowledge, skills, abilities, socially required qualities of personality allowing the psychologist to solve problems in all the fields of professional activities. A model of PQFEP predicts the formation of emotion-based, communicative, gnostical, motivational, practical and reflexive components. The achievement of the goal is provided by the realization of functions of propaedeutic, adaptive, prophylactic, correctional development nature, as well as by the program of PQFEP formation in which the interconnection of all forms of psychologist’s work (lectures, seminars, trainings, correction psychology work, etc.) along with the further controlling on four levels (inadmissible level, critical level, acceptable level and desirable level) is included. The process of the PQFEP-formation is provided in five stages: targeting, positive attitude formation, theoretical prerequisites formation, trial and frontal adoption. The task of each stage is decomposition of the general goal of the whole process. The result of work is an increase of the formation level of the PQFEP-components which are the following: communicative level (leadership, communication ability), gnostical level (knowledge of psychologist’s professional activity; the ability of creative usage of professional experience; psychologist’s abilities and skills; intellectual power, smart mind and creative thinking), emotion-based level (empathy; emotional resistance; independent decision-making ability), reflexive level (ability for adequate self-rating and self-regulation), motivational level (aggressiveness) and practical level (task-oriented mind).
Keywords: components, forms of working, functions, level, model, personality qualities of future educational psychologists (PQFEP), process, program, regularities, stages.
References
Craft, A. (2011). Creativity and Education Futures. Learning in a Digital Age. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
Dolgova, V. I. (2014). Aspects of emotional stability in volunteers of gerontology programs. Advances in Gerontology, 4(4), 275.
Dolgova, V. I. (2014a). Aspects of emotional stability in volunteers of gerontology programs. Advances in Gerontology, 4(4), 278-282.
Dolgova V.I., Rokickaya Y.A., Volchegorskaya E.Y., Yemelyanova E.E. and Uvarina N.V. (2016). A study of psychological readiness of parents to educate children in the foster family. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL & SCIENCE EDUCATION 2016, 11(15), 8592-8598.
Dolgova, V. I. (2014b). Impact of the arch suburb on the state of health, activity and mood of a person. Biosciences Biotechnology Research in Asia, 11, 307-311.
Dolgova, V. I. (2016). Individual-typological traits in the structure of emotional stability of personality. GISAP: Psychological Sciences, 9, 30-34.
Entwistle, N., McCune, V., and Hounsell, J. (2003). Investigating ways of enhancing university teaching-learning environments: Measuring of the student. Approaches to studying and perceptions of teaching. In E. d. Corte (Ed.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions. Amsterdam: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 89-107.
Fursova, D.V. (2014). Academic success and the emotional intelligence of the future psychologist. Acmeology, S1-2, 229-230.
Garcia-Cepero, M. C. (2008). The enrichment triad model: nurturing creative-productivity among college students. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int., 45, 295-302.
Gibbs, G. and Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5 (1), 87-100.
Lave, J. (2009). The practice of learning. In Illeris, K. (ed.) Contemporary theories of learning. Learning theorist’ in their own words, pp. 200-208.
Lee, V. S. (2004). Teaching and learning through inquiry. Sterling, VA20166, USA: Stylus Publishing.
Lozhkina, L.I. (2015). Formation of professional consciousness of psychologists through the study of primary sources. News of Saratov University. New series. Acmeology of Education. Developmental Psychology, 4(3), 199-203.
Marishchuk, L.V. and Yukhnovets, T.I. (2011). Communication qualities of future psychologists as an indicator of the success of mastering the profession. Psychology of training, 2, 53-65.
Mischel, W., Morf, C.C., Leary, M.R. and Tangney, J.P. (2003). The self as a psycho-social dynamic processing system: A meta-perspective on a century of the self in psychology Handbook of self and identity. N.Y.; London: The Guildford Press, pp. 15-43.
Moskovaya, Yu.A. (2012). Methods of forming personal readiness of students-psychologists to professional activity in pedagogical higher education institution. Proceedings SWorld, 12(1), 73-80.
Nevryuev, A.N. and Mokhova, S.B. (2013). Features of strategies of conflict behavior of students (psychology and non-psychology majors). Experimental Psychology, 6(1), 87-97.
Petrenko, E.A. and Shalabayeva, I.V. (2014). Research of professionally important qualities of the future psychologists. Person, family and society: questions of pedagogy and psychology, 41, 165-170.
Polukhina, O.P. and Polyanskaya, N.V. (2015). Professional and personal position of the psychology students as professionally important quality of future professional. The area of science, 3, 33-36.
Postareff, L. (2007). Teaching in Higher Education. From Content-focused to Learning-focused Approaches to Teaching. Research Report 214. Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki.
Salgado, J. (2002). The Big Five personality dimensions and counterproductive behaviors. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10 (1-2), 117-125.